Donald Trump is a vile misogynist – but he’s not the only one | Jonathan Freedland

Victory for Hillary Clinton will not be enough to defeat the torrent of sexism unleashed by this US presidential campaign

Four years ago Mitt Romney became a global laughing stock when he talked proudly about “binders full of women”. It was a funny phrase, no doubt about it. But watch the clip now, and it’s hard not to feel sympathy for the hapless Romney. He was recalling his spell as governor of Massachusetts and his discovery on taking office that too many senior posts were filled by men. He told his aides to encourage more female applicants, and they duly returned with “binders full of women”, a move that eventually led Romney to have the most gender-balanced senior team of all 50 US state governors. But he worded it badly, so he became an object of derision.

How long ago that seems now. While the 2012 campaign’s idea of a sexist outrage was a poor turn of phrase hinting at tokenism and condescension, 2016 has seen the nominee of a major party exposed as a perpetrator of sexual assault. Recorded on tape admitting that his modus operandi is to force himself on women, push his tongue down their throats without their consent and to “grab them by the pussy”, Donald Trump has since been confronted by at least 10 women who have testified that this was indeed his method – and that what he said into that hot mic in 2005 was the truth.

Continue reading...

The man who cried rigged: the problem with Trump’s election claims

Whenever Donald Trump is cornered, he accuses his opponents of fighting dirty. This time, his claims of voter fraud might actually be right – but for the wrong reasons

The thing you need to know about Donald Trump is that he never loses. Never. Whether it’s in business or politics, Trump either wins outright or he was going to win until victory was stolen from him, usually through a crooked conspiracy of his enemies.

That’s why his assorted bankruptcies and collapses were never his fault, why even his multimillion-dollar failures were actually successes. It’s why, when his TV show, The Apprentice, failed to win an Emmy, it was proof not that the programme was lacking but that the Emmys themselves were unfair, “all politics” and “horrendous”.

Continue reading...

If they really wanted to Stop the War in Syria, they’d target Russia | Jonathan Freedland

If the United States were bombing Aleppo, peace protesters would be besieging its embassy. So why let Vladimir Putin off the hook?

Pity the luckless children of Aleppo. If only the bombs raining down on them, killing their parents, maiming their friends, destroying their hospitals – if only those bombs were British or, better still, American.

Related: Aleppo hospital bombed again as Assad vows to 'clean' city

Related: Ground down by savagery – the agony of Aleppo

Continue reading...

Can Ed Balls’s Strictly stint reinvigorate New Labour? | The panel

The former shadow chancellor has improbably samba’d his way into the public affections. Our panel debates if this will be a quickstep back to the heady days of New Labour

Related: Strictly Come Dancing hits series high as Ed Balls goes green

Related: 'Listen to us. Send Ed Balls home' – the Strictly judges bare their teeth

Related: Don’t mock – Ed Balls on Strictly Come Dancing is smart politics | Gaby Hinsliff

Related: Strictly hopeful Ed Balls puts on his dancing shoes – in pictures

Continue reading...

We’re marching towards a mad Brexit. Someone must speak for the 48% | Jonathan Freedland

Theresa May casts those who voted to remain in the EU as a tiny metropolitan elite, but they represent nearly half of Britain

Among the multiple absurdities uttered by those who demanded Britain’s departure from the European Union is the claim that, since the sky has not yet fallen in, all those gloomy warnings from the remain crowd have been proved wrong. Absurd because – and it’s odd that they haven’t spotted this – we have not yet left. We remainers believed that it was the actual leaving, not a mere vote to leave, that would bring economic havoc. That the first few post-referendum months seemed steady enough can be attributed to the hope nurtured by some of our trading partners, along with the markets, that we might not go ahead with this planned act of national self-harm, that we might step back from the brink.

Related: Pound hits another 31-year low as Hammond launches Wall Street charm offensive –as it happened

Related: The pound is worth less – but what does it mean for Brits?

Continue reading...

Will Theresa May’s speech appeal beyond Tory conference? Our panel’s verdict | Jonathan Freedland, Polly Toynbee, Anne McElvoy, Joseph Harker, Giles Fraser

The prime minister attempted to occupy the political centre ground vacated by Labour. Did she succeed? Our writers give their views

Related: We are witnessing nothing less than a Tory reformation | Rafael Behr

Related: Will Theresa May be the next Tory leader to be bulldozed by the Europhobes? | Polly Toynbee

Related: The Tories are using the army to take a shot at human rights | Conor Gearty

Continue reading...

The Guardian Live interview with Ed Balls and Jonathan Freedland

From the Labour conference in Liverpool, Ed Balls talks to the Guardian’s Jonathan Freedland about his memoir, his views on Labour’s survival and whether he’ll return to politics after Strictly Come Dancing

Ed Balls describes his memoir – Speaking Out: Lessons in Life and Politics – as a user manual for potential politicians and a chance to show what this much-maligned group are really like.

So what are his views on the leaderships of Ed Miliband and Gordon Brown? How does he think the party can survive when so many Labour MPs appear at odds with Jeremy Corbyn? At a Guardian Live event in Liverpool, he discussed his political career and his hopes for the future with the Guardian’s Jonathan Freedland.

Continue reading...

Jeremy Corbyn could heal Labour’s immigration divide. Sadly, he’s doing the opposite | Jonathan Freedland

By shunning the single market yet insisting on free movement, the leader infuriates his Brexiters and remainers all at once

A hundred days on and the talk around Brexit is as delusional as ever. This week it fell to Liam Fox, the international trade secretary, who is not allowed to negotiate international trade – that’s Brussels’ job until Britain leaves – to add to the already thick fog of fantasy. Fox declared that, after the UK had left the EU, it would enjoy terms of commerce with Europe “at least as free” as those we had when we were still in. That makes perfect sense – if you think the EU’s remaining 27 members are itching to show that exiting the EU exacts no cost, staying brings no benefits and others should start following us out the door.

Where there is not magical thinking, there is vagueness and opacity. The prime minister might allow us a glimpse of her preferred degree of Brexit when she addresses the Tory party conference on Wednesday, but so far the only clues have come from the serial slapdowns she has delivered to her ministers when they have supplied hints of their own.

Related: Labour urged to make immigration controls a key Brexit demand

Related: Archbishop of York says EU countries are 'shunting migrants' towards UK

Continue reading...